AL Central

Winning the National League Pennant

Today, Jon Weisman over at Dodger Thoughts posed an interesting way of looking at the upcoming season in “2008 Goal: The National League Pennant”.

Not that I don’t want the Dodgers to win the World Series. But the American League looks so much stronger than the National League that I’m not going to fret too much about the Dodgers beating the AL’s best. I’m willing to be Cinderella at that point.

The argument is to not blow up a core group of players that might well put us in contention every year through 2013 (including 2008), all for the sake of a long-shot 2008 push with “who knows?” after that. As Jon says,

The Dodgers do need to improve to win the NL, but they don’t need to improve radically.

Looking back over the last few years, it’s easy to pick out certain winning franchises that could be used as models, everything from the seemingly moribund Marlins to the Yankees juggernaut. Most recently, we see the Red Sox winning a couple of times after a really long wait.

What’s the right answer? The fact is there is no one way to win, no magic incantations to be chanted during the off-season to reveal the right moves to make.

For informational purposes, let’s look at the results of the 13 World Series after the 1994 strike.

YEAR    WINNER            LOSER
-----------------------------------------
1995    Braves (NL)       Indians (AL)
1996    Yankees (AL)      Braves (NL)
1997    Marlins (NL) †    Indians (AL)
1998    Yankees (AL)      Padres (NL)
1999    Yankees (AL)      Braves (NL)
2000    Yankees (AL)      Mets (NL) †
2001    Dbacks (NL)       Yankees (AL)
2002    Angels (AL) †     Giants (NL) †
2003    Marlins (NL) †    Yankees (AL)
2004    Red Sox (AL) †    Cardinals (NL)
2005    White Sox (AL)    Astros (NL) †
2006    Cardinals (NL)    Tigers (AL) †
2007    Red Sox (AL)      Rockies (NL) †

† = Wild Card

What we see is:

  • NL won five times, AL won eight.
  • Wild Card teams have collectively made nine appearances (out of 26 possible), winning four. However, eight of those nine have been since 2000.
  • Outpacing everybody, the Yankees made six appearances, winning four…but none since 2000.

Broken down by divisions:

DIVISION        WINS/APPEARANCES
--------------------------------
AL East        6 of 8
NL East        3 of 6
NL West        1 of 4
AL Central     1 of 4
NL Central     1 of 3
AL West        1 of 1

No surprises there.

Now, the Dodgers are not the Yankees nor the Red Sox when it comes to budget. However, there seems to be a “21st Century World Series” emerging, to look at 2001-2007:

  • On the AL side, the Red Sox have won two of two appearances, and the Yankees have lost both of their two.
  • Also for the AL, they have won four of the seven series so far this century.
  • For the NL, the Cardinals are the only team to appear more than once, and they won one of two.
  • And the NL have won three of the seven.

In other words, nobody’s dominating — not a league, nor a single team, except maybe the Red Sox.

Again, there isn’t a right answer to get to the crapshoot that is the World Series.

Assuming the goal is to win the National League Pennant, however, is there anything to learn from the National League Championship Series winners?

YEAR    WINNER          LOSER
----------------------------------
1995    Braves          Reds
1996    Braves          Cardinals
1997    Marlins †       Braves
1998    Padres          Braves
1999    Braves          Mets †
2000    Mets †          Cardinals
2001    Diamondbacks    Braves
2002    Giants †        Cardinals
2003    Marlins †       Cubs
2004    Cardinals       Astros †
2005    Astros †        Cardinals
2006    Cardinals       Mets
2007    Rockies †       Diamondbacks

Of course, the first thing that jumps out of you is how dominant the Braves were for a long time. You also see they haven’t been back to the NLCS since 2001.

The 21st Century NLCS, 2001-2007:

  • Somehow, the Cardinals are always hanging around.
  • Wild Card teams have won four of those seven.
  • Might 2007 be a portent of the next decade of NL West dominance?

If that last item is the case, and signs point to yes, then the goal “Win the National League Pennant” becomes “Win the NL West.” Beyond that, it’s a crapshoot.

And of course, we knew that already.

So, my conclusions:

  • The Dodgers don’t have the budget of the Red Sox or Yankees, so can’t spend their money willy-nilly.
  • To win the NL Pennant, the Dodgers have to strive to win the NL West.
  • To be able to win the NL Pennant over the next decade, we cannot blow gaping holes in the lineup in order to maybe win in 2008. We can maybe win in 2008 without the gaping holes.
  • Wait however many years it takes for the Fox TV deal to expire, then start raking in the cash like the Yankees and Red Sox do. ;)

AL Central
Dodgers
History
MLB
Playoffs

Comments (0)

Permalink

Buehrle in Dodger Blue?

With the consistent inconsistency of Hong-Chih Kuo — not to mention Brett “10-run cushion” Tomko — Ned Colletti has talked in interviews about looking to add another starting pitcher. Alongside the elusive power bat, which he’s been trying to get through free agency or trade since the off-season, this will likely be his primary focus for the foreseeable future. (He’s talked about getting another reliever, too, but maybe that will fade if Chin-Hui Tsao stays healthy and Mark Hendrickson stays serviceable.)

While there are potential Plan Bs (well, Plan Cs) lurking in Las Vegas, e.g. Eric Stults and DJ Houlton, it stands to reason that some of the potentially available big leaguers will be attractive.

The biggest name being linked to the Dodgers at the moment is Mark Buehrle, whose midseason negotiations with the White Sox are turning into a brouhaha to match the South Siders’ sorry season. The latest from the Chicago Sun-Times is that the pitcher has turned down a four-year, $56 million extension (due to a denied no-trade clause, reportedly), and thus is back on the block. As much as he’s been on and off the block recently, it’s a wonder he hasn’t pulled something. From the article:

The source also told the Sun-Times that general manager Ken Williams wasted no time taking phone calls from both the New York Mets and Los Angeles Dodgers about a possible trade involving the left-handed starter.

Talks briefly opened up again after the Sox’ 8-1 loss to the Royals on Friday night but quickly died.

It’s anyone’s guess if the two sides will reopen negotiations. Williams had set Friday as the cutoff.

Mark Buehrle is a 28-year-old southpaw from Missouri who is currently sporting a 3.33 ERA and 1.10 WHIP, with 66 Ks and 20 BB over 100 innings. That WHIP would tie him for third in the National League behind only Jake Peavy and Chris Young.

While we’re on the subject, check out who are the current top six NL pitchers in WHIP:

  1. Jake Peavy (SD)
  2. Chris Young (SD)
  3. Rich Hill (CHC)
  4. Ted Lilly (CHC)
  5. Brad Penny (LAD)
  6. Derek Lowe (LAD)

We faced #2 last night and unfortunately lost despite the late heroics. Tonight, #1 and #5 face off. Gotta love the ever-burgeoning Padres vs Dodgers rivalry.

Buerhle has no less than 200 innings pitched per season since 2001. I also like the fact he’s all about the low pitch counts. Oh, and the no hitter he tossed a couple of months ago isn’t too shabby either. (Actually, he was a Sammy Sosa walk away from a perfect game, then picked him off moments later.)

Who would we have to give up to get him? Young guys, I would assume — the White Sox are in meltdown.

Stay tuned.

UPDATE

A poster on Dodger Thoughts (”silverwood” in today’s thread) had this to say about Buehrle:

Buehrle is incredibly overrated. Awful last year, with an embarrassing K/9 rate.

NO THANKS.

So I looked the following up and posted it there. I don’t know, 2007 Buehrle doesn’t seem that embarrassing lined up with our current staff:

Buehrle has a 5.94 K/9 rate so far this year. Brad Penny’s is 5.96. Derek Lowe’s is 6.30.

Penny: K/BB 2.50, K/9 5.96, BB/9 2.38, H/9 7.75, WHIP 1.13

Lowe: K/BB 2.31, K/9 6.30, BB/9 2.72, H/9 7.55, WHIP 1.14

Buehrle: K/BB 3.30, K/9 5.94, BB/9 1.80, H/9 8.10, WHIP 1.10

Not arguing for or against, just sayin’.

For completeness’ sake:

Wolf: K/BB 2.66, K/9 8.40, BB/9 3.16, H/9 9.48, WHIP 1.40

Kuo: K/BB 1.93, K/9 8.01, BB/9 4.15, H/9 10.38, WHIP 1.62

AL Central
Dodgers
MLB
NL West
Rumors

Comments (0)

Permalink