The deal that wasn’t
Nothing like some extra drama in the form of undone deals and rumors to stoke the Hot Stove League during the cold winter months. Phil Rogers in the Chicago Tribune talks about a trippy one involving the Cubs and everybody’s favorite prodigal outfielder:
A rumor circulated before the Cubs announced their baseball-only deal with Jeff Samardzija on Friday. It had the Cubs spending heavily on a surprise center fielder—J.D. Drew.
It doesn’t seem there was anything to it, although you wonder how much longer it will be before some open contentiousness rears its head between Drew and the Boston Red Sox. Ditto Barry Bonds and the San Francisco Giants.
What’s interesting is Rogers’ main point, in the title: “Bonds’, Drew’s deals dangerous”, and it’s all to do with labor relations, which were seemingly on track with the new collective bargain agreement last year. If Bonds and Drew aren’t signed, and soon, there is potential for a big, ugly fight between the league and union.
Is it likely, though? Probably not. No one, except maybe the lawyers, want a big labor brouhaha on top of the drug situation.
Besides, it’ll all be moot when Barry gets indicted for perjury later this year, deal or no deal. ;)
